The Khawaarij are the dogs of Hell

The Khawaarij (Kharijites) are one of the deviant sects, as is proven by the texts and by scholarly consensus.

Al-Bukhaari (6934) and Muslim (1068) narrated that Yusayr ibn

‘Amr said: I said to Sahl ibn Hunayf: Did you hear the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) say anything about the Khawaarij? He said: I heard him say – and he gestured with his hand towards Iraq –: “From there will emerge people who recite the Qur’an, but it will not go past their collarbones. They will pass out of Islam as an arrow passes out of the prey.”

Ibn Maajah (173) narrated that Ibn Abi Awfa said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said:

“The Khawaarij are the dogs of Hell.”

Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah.

The Khawaarij are followers of whims and desires and innovation who have deviated from the path of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, but we do not describe them as disbelievers because of their innovation, unlike others who follow whims and desires.

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The view of ash-Shaafa‘i and the majority of his fellow scholars is that the Khawaarij are not to be described as disbelievers; this also applies to the Qadariyyah and the majority of the Mu‘tazilah and other groups that follow whims and desires.

End quote from Sharh Muslim, 7/160

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The Khawaarij who deviated, whom the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) enjoined us to fight, and whom Ameer al-Mu’mineen ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), one of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs fought, and whom the leading scholars of Islam among the Sahaabah, Taabi‘een and those who came after them were unanimously agreed upon fighting, were not described as disbelievers by ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqaas and others among the Sahaabah; rather they regarded them as Muslims even though they fought them, and ‘Ali did not fight them until they shed blood unlawfully and raided the property of the Muslims; then he fought them in order to ward off their wrongdoing and aggression, not because they were disbelievers. Hence he did not take their womenfolk captive and he did not seize their wealth as booty.

End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 3/282

Ibn ‘Aabideen (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Even though you may find that some scholars, within the context of debating with the Mu‘tazilah and other groups, use the word kufr (disbelief) when refuting their arguments, what they meant is that their (the Mu‘tazilah’s) arguments would inevitably constitute disbelief, without implying that they themselves were disbelievers, because what may be concluded from a view is not necessarily to be attributed to the one who holds that view.

Moreover, they think that they have shar‘i evidence to support their view, even though they are wrong and are falling into error.

End quote from Haashiyat Ibn ‘Aabideen, 3/46

Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Saalih al-Mahmoud (may Allah preserve him) was asked: Are the Khawaarij kaafirs (disbelievers)?

He replied:

The scholars differed as to whether they are disbelievers, but the correct view is that they are not to be regarded as disbelievers. ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) was asked about them: Are they disbelievers? He said: They fled from disbelief, but they fell into the innovation of labelling others as disbelievers; we will not fall into the innovation of labelling others as disbelievers and thus label them as such. This is the correct view, in sha Allah, even though their innovations may be described as innovations that constitute kufr.

End quote from Lam‘at al-I‘tiqaad, 7/26

Among their innovations are the following:

• They think that faith does not increase or decrease
• They think that failing to do something obligatory constitutes disbelief.
• They think that committing a major sin constitutes disbelief.
• They believe in fighting those Muslims who disagree with them.

And Allah knows best.